Banner image for Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS)

Overall employee rating

3.2
Based on 9 reviews
Rating distribution: 0 reviews rated 5 out of 5 stars. 0 reviews rated 4 out of 5 stars. 8 reviews rated 3 out of 5 stars. 1 reviews rated 2 out of 5 stars. 0 reviews rated 1 out of 5 stars.
5
4
3
2
1
Detail Ratings
Work life balance
3.0
Career Growth
2.0
Work flexibility
2.0
Job Security
5.0
Pay and benefits
4.0
Leadership
3.0
Company Culture
3.0
Disclaimer: Reviews on Jobstore are independently submitted by users; we do not guarantee the accuracy or truth of any individual submission. Read more
Financial Analyst
3.4
4 July 2026

Solid Security, Pay Could Be More Competitive

It's a stable place to work, especially for financial regulation, but don't expect to get rich quick with the pay.


Pros

The base salary as a Financial Analyst is pretty decent, especially for a central banking role in Singapore. You get excellent job security here, which is a huge plus. Benefits like healthcare and leave are standard and reliable.


Cons

Annual raises aren't super generous, so salary progression feels quite slow. Bonuses aren't as competitive as what you'd see in the private financial sector. The overall pay package can make you feel a bit undervalued compared to market rates in Singapore.


Advice to Management

Revisit the compensation structure for mid-level roles. Making salary progression more attractive could really help retain talent, especially in competitive financial regulation fields.


Ratings by topic
4.0
Work life balance
3.0
Career Growth
3.0
Work flexibility
5.0
Job Security
3.0
Pay and benefits
3.0
Leadership
3.0
Company Culture

Similar reviews
Regulatory Analyst
3.4
26 February 2026
Decent Place for Stability, Career Growth Varies
Pros: You get solid exposure to financial regulation and the wider banking sector here in Singapore. For someone starting out as a Regulatory Analyst, the learning curve is steep and beneficial. The job security is fantastic; it's a stable public sector agency.
Cons: Career growth for a Regulatory Analyst can feel pretty stagnant after a few years. It's tough to move up unless someone leaves, and internal mobility across departments isn't always easy. Sometimes new projects are slow to kick off.
Advice to Management: Focus on creating clearer paths for career growth, especially for mid-level roles. Encourage more cross-departmental rotations to help employees build broader skills in financial regulation.
Show more
Regulatory Analyst
3.3
17 February 2026
Okay Hybrid Flexibility at MAS
Pros: As a Regulatory Analyst, I appreciated the official hybrid model. Being able to work from home a few days a week was good for managing errands in Singapore. It's a decent start for a big financial regulatory body like MAS.
Cons: There's still a strong push for onsite presence, even when it's not strictly necessary. For my role in financial regulation, it often felt like we had too many mandatory office days. This limits true work flexibility, making personal appointments tough to schedule sometimes.
Advice to Management: Trust employees more with their schedules. Evaluate actual output, not just presence in the Singapore office. More flexibility would boost morale for those in central banking roles.
Show more
Regulatory Analyst
3.0
17 February 2026
MAS: Decent Stability, Culture Needs Work
Pros: It's a really stable place to work, especially for anyone in financial regulation roles. The job security is solid, typical for a public sector organization in Singapore. You learn a lot about the Singapore financial landscape.
Cons: The culture can feel pretty old-school and hierarchical. There's often a lack of innovation, which isn't great for new ideas. It's tough to get your voice heard in the Singapore office, even as an experienced analyst.
Advice to Management: Encourage more bottom-up feedback and embrace new ways of working. Innovation isn't just about technology, it's about mindsets too.
Show more

Are you sure?

Once you confirm, please note that this action cannot be undone.