Shell

Pros: For non-field roles like mine, the hybrid work model is a solid perk. I could typically work from home 2-3 days a week in the Houston, TX office, which really helped with my commute. It's a good setup for a large oil and gas company.
Cons: True remote work is almost non-existent for engineering roles; you have to be in the office a set number of days. Managers also have a lot of discretion, so some teams get more flexibility than others. It's not always consistent across departments in this energy sector giant.
Advice to Management: Standardize the hybrid policy more clearly across all departments. Give managers clearer guidelines on flexibility so it's not so dependent on individual discretion for onshore engineering positions.

Pros: Some teams have a pretty solid hybrid model, allowing 2-3 days WFH. It's a big corporate environment, so you get stability. For office-based roles, it's not bad if your manager is cool.
Cons: As a Process Engineer, I often faced strong onsite requirements, especially for operations support in the energy sector. This meant less flexibility than I hoped for, making work-life balance a bit tough. The company could do better for technical roles.
Advice to Management: Consider allowing more remote options or structured hybrid schedules for technical roles that don't absolutely require daily onsite presence. This would really help with employee morale and retention in the competitive energy sector.

Pros: For technical roles like mine as a Field Engineer, there's a decent hybrid work option. I could often work remotely two days a week, which was a big plus for avoiding the Houston traffic and managing personal appointments. The company supports some flexibility for those not directly involved in refinery operations.
Cons: The promised work flexibility wasn't always consistent across teams. Sometimes, managers would require more onsite days for the Houston, TX office without much notice, which made planning tough. It often felt like remote work was tolerated, not fully embraced, especially in parts of the traditional oil and gas industry culture.
Advice to Management: Try to standardize remote work policies across departments. Give teams more autonomy to decide what works best for their specific projects, rather than blanket rules.

Pros: The hybrid model in the Houston, TX office is a solid perk. It's nice to have a few days working from home, especially for deep-focus tasks. For Petroleum Engineer roles, some remote work is definitely possible.
Cons: Honestly, true work flexibility is pretty limited, especially for exploration projects. You're expected onsite a lot, which makes planning tough. It's not a fully remote setup in the oil and gas industry here.
Advice to Management: Managers should clarify realistic onsite expectations for technical staff better. Don't promise hybrid if it's mostly onsite in practice, especially for field-heavy roles.

Pros: Shell offers a stable career in the oil and gas industry, which is a big plus. You can find some flexibility with WFH days, especially in non-operational, office-based roles in the Houston, TX office. It's nice to occasionally avoid the commute.
Cons: As a Project Manager, the 'hybrid' model felt more like mandatory office time, sometimes up to 4 days a week. True work flexibility is often limited, particularly for those on active refinery projects. It's tough to manage personal appointments with strict onsite requirements.
Advice to Management: Management should seriously review the actual implementation of the hybrid policy. Give Project Managers and other operational roles more trust and actual flexibility, not just a policy name. Focus on results, not just butts in seats for refinery projects.