Banner image for World Food Programme

Overall employee rating

3.2
Based on 4 reviews
5
4
3
2
1
Detail Ratings
Work life balance
3.0
Career Growth
3.0
Work flexibility
3.0
Job Security
4.0
Pay and benefits
4.0
Leadership
3.0
Company Culture
3.0
Disclaimer: Reviews on Jobstore are independently submitted by users; we do not guarantee the accuracy or truth of any individual submission. Read more
Programme Policy Officer
3.3
22 March 2026
Great mission, but contract uncertainty is real
Pros: It's a solid UN agency, so the overall job stability for the organization itself is high. Being part of humanitarian aid feels meaningful. As a Programme Policy Officer in the Rome office, you feel like your work truly matters.
Cons: A huge chunk of the roles, especially for field operations or specialized projects, are fixed-term contracts. This means you're always thinking about the next renewal, which is tough for long-term career planning. It's hard to get a truly permanent position here.
Advice to Management: Please look into creating more permanent pathways for experienced staff. The constant contract renewals lead to stress and make it harder to retain talent. Investing in staff stability would really boost morale across the board.
Show more
Programme Officer
3.1
18 February 2026
WFP: Decent Mission, Okay Compensation
Pros: As a Programme Officer, the international benefits package is pretty solid. You get decent health insurance and a good amount of annual leave, which is expected from UN agencies.
Cons: Honestly, the base salary for international staff in Rome doesn't quite keep up with the high cost of living. There aren't many clear paths for pay raises or performance bonuses in the development aid sector, which can be frustrating.
Advice to Management: WFP management should really look at adjusting salaries, especially for HQ staff in high cost-of-living cities like Rome. It would help retain talent in the humanitarian aid sector.
Show more
Programme Officer
3.3
29 January 2026
Okay Flexibility for a Humanitarian Role
Pros: We do get some WFH days here at the Rome, Italy HQ, which is a big plus. It's solid for managing personal life and generally better than you'd expect for a big UN agency in the humanitarian assistance sector.
Cons: This flexibility isn't really a thing for field missions or when project deadlines are tight. The workload for a Programme Officer can be intense, so true flexibility often feels more like working late than choosing your hours.
Advice to Management: Consider how to offer more consistent flexibility across all roles, not just HQ. Field staff also need work-life balance when they're not actively deployed.
Show more

Latest jobs from World Food Programme

More jobs
Programme Assistant
3.0
29 December 2025
Mission Driven, Culture Can Be a Challenge
Pros: The sense of purpose in humanitarian aid is huge. As a Programme Assistant, you truly feel like you're contributing to global food security. Colleagues in the Rome office are dedicated, which really makes you feel part of something important.
Cons: The company culture often feels very bureaucratic. It's tough to implement new ideas quickly within such a large international organization. There's a noticeable lack of transparent communication from leadership at times, which can be frustrating for staff.
Advice to Management: Focus more on internal communication and breaking down silos. It's hard for staff to feel fully engaged when the culture feels so fragmented. Invest in training for middle management on fostering a more open and collaborative environment, especially for Programme Assistant roles and similar operational positions.
Show more

See More Companies

Are you sure?

Once you confirm, please note that this action cannot be undone.