Banner image for Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Overall employee rating

3.1
Based on 7 reviews
5
4
3
2
1
Detail Ratings
Work life balance
3.0
Career Growth
3.0
Work flexibility
3.0
Job Security
4.0
Pay and benefits
4.0
Leadership
2.0
Company Culture
3.0
Disclaimer: Reviews on Jobstore are independently submitted by users; we do not guarantee the accuracy or truth of any individual submission. Read more
Clinical Trial Manager
3.3
10 April 2026
Hybrid Model is Okay for Clinical Roles
Pros: As a Clinical Trial Manager, the hybrid work setup works for me. We typically do 2-3 days in the Boston office, which is manageable. It's nice to have some flexibility for appointments, especially in the biopharmaceutical industry.
Cons: The flexibility isn't totally consistent across all teams or even departments. Some managers are stricter about in-office days than others. I wish there were more fully remote options for certain roles, especially when projects are quieter.
Advice to Management: Standardize the hybrid policies more and consider truly remote options for roles that don't require daily lab or onsite presence.
Show more
Research Scientist
3.4
2 April 2026
Decent balance for biotech, but it varies.
Pros: As a Research Scientist, I usually get my 40 hours in during the week. The hybrid work setup is solid, giving me WFH days and less commuting to the Boston, MA office. It's a big corporate environment, so things are structured.
Cons: Sometimes project deadlines in the biotech industry mean long nights and weekend work. You can't always avoid it, especially close to a clinical trial milestone. It's not a true 9-to-5, so be prepared for that.
Advice to Management: Try to manage project timelines better to prevent constant crunch periods for Research Scientist roles. More support during critical phases would really help with work-life balance.
Show more
Research Scientist
3.0
29 March 2026
Culture is a work in progress at Alexion
Pros: It's great to be part of the biopharma industry here. I've worked with really smart people, especially in rare diseases research. The benefits package is solid, and pay is decent for a Research Scientist role.
Cons: Honestly, the company culture can be tough to navigate. There's some internal politics that really slow down clinical development. It's hard to feel truly connected, even in the Boston office with a hybrid schedule.
Advice to Management: Leadership needs to walk the talk on inclusion and transparency. Address silos between departments, especially across drug discovery and clinical teams. That would truly improve morale.
Show more
Clinical Research Associate
3.1
27 March 2026
Leadership is a real mixed bag here
Pros: My direct supervisor was pretty supportive, which is a huge plus. We got good benefits and compensation, which is typical for the biopharmaceutical industry. The hybrid work model helps with work-life balance.
Cons: Upper leadership can be really out of touch. Decisions often feel arbitrary and not well communicated, especially for those of us in the Boston office. It's hard to get clear direction for long-term projects as a Clinical Research Associate.
Advice to Management: Managers, please improve communication across all levels. Be more transparent with strategic changes and how they impact day-to-day work. Listen to employees more often.
Show more
Clinical Research Associate
3.1
9 February 2026
Career growth isn't a given here
Pros: The benefits package is solid, especially the health insurance. It's a stable job within the biopharmaceutical industry. Plus, working on rare disease therapies feels truly meaningful.
Cons: Career growth is really tough as a Clinical Research Associate. There's not much upward mobility in the Boston office unless you're already in management. Internal transfers are rare, and people often leave for promotions elsewhere.
Advice to Management: Create clearer pathways for individual contributor career growth. Invest more in internal training and mentorship for non-management roles. Promote from within more often instead of hiring externally for higher positions.
Show more
Associate Scientist
2.4
17 December 2025
Leadership Needs to Step Up Big Time
Pros: The team I worked with directly as an Associate Scientist was really collaborative. People genuinely try to help each other out, which is good for bench scientists. Benefits for corporate roles are also pretty solid, typical for the biotech industry.
Cons: Leadership communication has been a huge mess, especially after the last big acquisition. It's hard to get clear direction, which really impacts project timelines for R&D. The Boston office feels a bit unstable, with a lot of mid-level management turnover.
Advice to Management: Focus on clear communication and provide a stable vision, especially for those of us in R&D. Invest in middle management training to support scientists better. The remote work options for non-lab roles should be clearer.
Show more
Clinical Research Associate
3.1
6 December 2025
Pay and Benefits are Solid for Pharma
Pros: As a Clinical Research Associate, the compensation package is quite competitive in the biopharmaceutical industry. The 401k match is pretty generous, and health benefits at the Boston office are solid.
Cons: Base salary raises can feel a bit small year-over-year sometimes. Bonus potential isn't always clear, especially for individual contributors in onsite roles. You definitely earn what you get.
Advice to Management: Review the annual bonus structure for mid-level employees to make it more transparent and motivating.
Show more

Are you sure?

Once you confirm, please note that this action cannot be undone.