Banner image for Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS)

Overall employee rating

3.2
Based on 9 reviews
5
4
3
2
1
Detail Ratings
Work life balance
3.0
Career Growth
2.0
Work flexibility
2.0
Job Security
5.0
Pay and benefits
4.0
Leadership
3.0
Company Culture
3.0
Disclaimer: Reviews on Jobstore are independently submitted by users; we do not guarantee the accuracy or truth of any individual submission. Read more

9 Reviews

Latest update 26 February 2026
Search reviews about working at Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS)
Regulatory Analyst
3.4
26 February 2026
Decent Place for Stability, Career Growth Varies
Pros: You get solid exposure to financial regulation and the wider banking sector here in Singapore. For someone starting out as a Regulatory Analyst, the learning curve is steep and beneficial. The job security is fantastic; it's a stable public sector agency.
Cons: Career growth for a Regulatory Analyst can feel pretty stagnant after a few years. It's tough to move up unless someone leaves, and internal mobility across departments isn't always easy. Sometimes new projects are slow to kick off.
Advice to Management: Focus on creating clearer paths for career growth, especially for mid-level roles. Encourage more cross-departmental rotations to help employees build broader skills in financial regulation.
Show more
Financial Analyst
3.4
19 February 2026
Solid Security, Pay Could Be More Competitive
Pros: The base salary as a Financial Analyst is pretty decent, especially for a central banking role in Singapore. You get excellent job security here, which is a huge plus. Benefits like healthcare and leave are standard and reliable.
Cons: Annual raises aren't super generous, so salary progression feels quite slow. Bonuses aren't as competitive as what you'd see in the private financial sector. The overall pay package can make you feel a bit undervalued compared to market rates in Singapore.
Advice to Management: Revisit the compensation structure for mid-level roles. Making salary progression more attractive could really help retain talent, especially in competitive financial regulation fields.
Show more
Regulatory Analyst
3.3
17 February 2026
Okay Hybrid Flexibility at MAS
Pros: As a Regulatory Analyst, I appreciated the official hybrid model. Being able to work from home a few days a week was good for managing errands in Singapore. It's a decent start for a big financial regulatory body like MAS.
Cons: There's still a strong push for onsite presence, even when it's not strictly necessary. For my role in financial regulation, it often felt like we had too many mandatory office days. This limits true work flexibility, making personal appointments tough to schedule sometimes.
Advice to Management: Trust employees more with their schedules. Evaluate actual output, not just presence in the Singapore office. More flexibility would boost morale for those in central banking roles.
Show more

Latest jobs from Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS)

More jobs
Regulatory Analyst
3.0
17 February 2026
MAS: Decent Stability, Culture Needs Work
Pros: It's a really stable place to work, especially for anyone in financial regulation roles. The job security is solid, typical for a public sector organization in Singapore. You learn a lot about the Singapore financial landscape.
Cons: The culture can feel pretty old-school and hierarchical. There's often a lack of innovation, which isn't great for new ideas. It's tough to get your voice heard in the Singapore office, even as an experienced analyst.
Advice to Management: Encourage more bottom-up feedback and embrace new ways of working. Innovation isn't just about technology, it's about mindsets too.
Show more
Senior Analyst
3.1
17 February 2026
MAS Has Solid Benefits, Okay Pay
Pros: The benefits are a big plus here. You get really good healthcare coverage and a decent annual leave package. Job security is also high, which is nice for a central bank role.
Cons: Pay isn't super competitive, especially for experienced Senior Analyst roles. Don't expect big private sector money in financial regulation. Bonuses are also pretty standard, nothing to write home about.
Advice to Management: MAS should really look at salary benchmarks. To attract top talent, especially for specialized financial regulation roles, pay needs to be more competitive with the market.
Show more
Regulatory Analyst
2.9
14 February 2026
MAS is solid for learning, but career path can be slow
Pros: Good initial learning curve in financial regulation. I've gained a lot of experience here as a Regulatory Analyst. The work on monetary policy and central bank functions is definitely interesting, and it's a stable government agency.
Cons: Career growth can feel pretty stagnant after the first few years. Promotions aren't quick in the Singapore office. There aren't many opportunities to jump to different teams easily for new challenges, especially for mid-level roles.
Advice to Management: Consider creating clearer internal mobility paths and accelerating promotion cycles for high-performing Regulatory Analysts. It would help retain talent in financial regulation.
Show more
Senior Analyst
3.4
13 February 2026
Decent place for stability, less for quick growth
Pros: You learn a lot about financial regulation in Singapore. There's good job security, which is a big plus as a Senior Analyst. The work environment is stable, and benefits are decent for a government agency.
Cons: Career growth isn't always fast; promotions can take a while. It's a bit rigid sometimes, and getting into new departments can be tough. If you're looking for quick advancement, this might not be it.
Advice to Management: Consider implementing clearer paths for career progression and internal mobility for dedicated staff. More opportunities for faster growth would help retain talent in key financial regulation areas.
Show more
Regulatory Analyst
3.0
7 February 2026
Solid Pay for a Government Agency Role
Pros: The salary for financial regulation roles here is quite competitive, especially for a government agency. I got a decent annual bonus consistently. The health benefits package is solid too, which is a big plus for onsite work.
Cons: While the pay is good, the overall benefits package doesn't quite match what you'd see in the private sector banks. Pay increments can feel a bit slow sometimes, and the leave policy could be more generous.
Advice to Management: Revisit the benefits package to be more competitive with private financial institutions. Also, consider more frequent or performance-based pay increments to keep talent motivated.
Show more
Financial Analyst
3.0
30 January 2026
MAS is stable, but career growth is slow
Pros: It's a really stable place, especially being a key government agency in the financial regulation industry. The job security is top-notch, and the pay and benefits are quite competitive for the Singapore office. You learn a lot about how the financial sector works here.
Cons: Career growth for a Financial Analyst can feel pretty stagnant after a few years. There aren't always clear promotion paths, and moving up often takes longer than expected. It's tough to find new challenges when internal mobility isn't super quick.
Advice to Management: Management should work on creating more transparent and accelerated career progression frameworks, especially for mid-level roles. Providing clearer paths for promotion and internal transfers would really help with employee retention and motivation.
Show more

See More Companies

Are you sure?

Once you confirm, please note that this action cannot be undone.