Egis

Pros: The projects are genuinely interesting, especially in transportation engineering. You get to work on some really big infrastructure projects, which is great for building your resume. Plus, the London office culture is pretty collaborative.
Cons: Work-life balance here is often a struggle. As a Civil Engineer, expect some long weeks, sometimes pushing 50+ hours regularly. WFH isn't as flexible as advertised for project deadlines, so onsite expectations are high.
Advice to Management: Really try to enforce a better work-life balance for project teams. Maybe re-evaluate staffing levels on key infrastructure projects to ease the workload. More genuine hybrid work options would help morale.

Pros: The teams in the Paris office are generally solid. I've learned a lot working on diverse infrastructure projects. People are usually willing to help, which is great as a Junior Civil Engineer.
Cons: It's a very big corporate engineering firm, so decisions can be slow. Sometimes the work-life balance isn't ideal, especially during project crunch times. There's a lot of bureaucracy that can make things frustrating.
Advice to Management: Try to cut down on some of the red tape, especially for smaller tasks. Empower team leads more to make quicker decisions on specific infrastructure projects. This would really help morale.

Pros: I learned a ton working on major infrastructure projects. My team in the Paris office was solid and collaborative. It's a good place if you want to gain experience on large-scale builds.
Cons: The company culture here feels really top-down and hierarchical. Getting decisions made takes forever, which can be frustrating as a Project Engineer trying to move things forward. There's not much room for trying new ideas.
Advice to Management: Try to empower middle management more and streamline decision processes. A more agile culture would really help boost morale and innovation across different departments.

Pros: The job security is solid for a global consulting firm. They have decent health coverage and some pension matching. As a Civil Engineer, the project variety in infrastructure projects is a big plus.
Cons: The base salary for engineering roles, especially entry to mid-level, feels a bit low for London's cost of living. Annual raises are usually pretty small, and the bonus structure isn't very transparent or generous. It's hard to feel like you're truly getting fair market value here.
Advice to Management: Review the compensation bands for engineering staff, especially in high-cost-of-living areas like London. More transparent bonus structures and better annual increases would really help retention for critical infrastructure project roles.

Pros: The pension plan is pretty solid, better than what I've seen at other smaller firms. You get good healthcare coverage which is a big plus, especially for us working on infrastructure projects. It's a stable employer, which offers some security.
Cons: What about the base pay? As a Junior Civil Engineer, it felt a bit low for the London office, honestly. Annual raises are usually pretty minimal, making it tough to really get ahead financially. Plus, bonuses aren't really a thing here.
Advice to Management: Review salary bands for junior roles in the UK market. Competitive compensation would help retain talent, especially those of us contributing to key infrastructure projects.

Pros: Some teams actually have a decent hybrid work model here. For non-project roles, it's sometimes easier to maintain a 40-hour week. The work itself on large infrastructure projects is usually quite engaging, which is a definite plus.
Cons: As a Project Engineer, work-life balance is pretty tough. Expect to put in a lot of extra hours, especially near major project deadlines. It feels like there's always pressure, making it hard to truly disconnect even when working remote from home. The construction industry hours can be brutal here.
Advice to Management: Egis needs to seriously look at resource allocation and project planning to ease the burden on project delivery teams. Improve the work-life balance for engineering roles; it's a critical retention factor. Encourage management to model healthy boundaries.

Pros: You get to work on really big infrastructure projects across various sectors. It's a great way to build a strong technical portfolio as a Civil Engineer. You'll definitely learn a lot if you're early in your career here.
Cons: Career growth isn't always super clear, especially within the same team. It often feels like you need to move departments or even leave the company to get a significant promotion. Opportunities to advance in the Paris office aren't always transparent.
Advice to Management: Please create clearer pathways for internal career progression, especially for technical roles like Civil Engineer. We need more transparency on how to move up without having to look externally.

Pros: Job security here is pretty solid, especially for core infrastructure projects. As a Civil Engineer, I rarely felt worried about my role. The company has a lot of ongoing work globally, so there's always something in the pipeline.
Cons: Sometimes project-based roles can feel a bit uncertain when contracts near their end. It's not always super clear what the next big thing for you will be. This can be tough, even in a big corporate environment.
Advice to Management: Try to communicate future project pipelines and individual career paths more clearly, especially for those on longer-term projects. It would help ease worries about what's next.

Pros: You learn a ton early on, especially working on large-scale infrastructure projects in the transportation sector. They have a good onboarding process for new grads and junior engineers. It's a stable company, which is nice.
Cons: Career growth is a real issue once you're past the initial few years as a Civil Engineer. Promotions are slow and often tied to someone else leaving, not your own performance. There's no clear path for progression, making it hard to see your future in the London office, especially in this big corporate structure.
Advice to Management: Egis needs to create clearer career progression paths for mid-level engineers. Implement a more performance-based promotion system instead of waiting for openings. Invest in professional development for long-term employees.

Pros: I've met some genuinely good people in the London office, especially within my immediate project teams. There's a decent sense of camaraderie when you're deep into those complex infrastructure projects. The company culture encourages collaboration on technical challenges, which is great for new engineering graduates.
Cons: Sometimes it feels like decisions take forever to come down from corporate. There's a bit of a 'wait and see' attitude which can't help slow down progress. Also, for hybrid work, the communication flow isn't always smooth across all teams.
Advice to Management: Try to empower project leads more to make quicker decisions. Improve hybrid communication strategies so everyone feels connected, whether remote or in the office.